16 October 2008

Time Out on BFI Film Centre

In this week's Time Out, Dave Calhoun ponders the case for the BFI Film Centre:


Why London needs a new national film theatre


As the London Film Festival opens this week, Dave Calhoun wonders when – and if – visions for replacing the National Film Theatre will ever be realised


Before he died earlier this year, Anthony Minghella often spoke about the need for a new public home for the British Film Institute, so that a cultural centre for cinema in London could stand shoulder to shoulder with the likes of the National Theatre and the Royal Festival Hall. Minghella’s plan was that the current National Film Theatre on the South Bank should be vacated over the next few years and a shiny new altar to all things celluloid built further down the river alongside the grander temples to the arts that line the South Bank from Tate Modern to Westminster Bridge.


So, 18 months after the very successful rebranding of the NFT as BFI Southbank, and on the occasion of the London Film Festival, it’s timely to ask: how are Minghella’s plans for a National Film Centre progressing? We spoke to the BFI and they were optimistic if cautious about economic and political obstacles. The key message, though, is that the BFI expects to receive a funding decision from the government by the end of the year and be able to race ahead with several years of fundraising to find the rest of the cash. Realistically, they’re looking at a 2014 opening date.


But there are also signs of ambitions being downgraded to match financial realities. Andy Burnham, Secretary of State for the Department of Culture, Media and Sport, has allotted a potential £45 million for the project should his department give the final sign-off. But he recently asked new BFI chair Greg Dyke and BFI director Amanda Nevill to resubmit their plans for the centre at a cost of £150m rather than £200m. Last Tuesday night, Dyke and Nevill met again with Burnham to present these new plans and the outcome of that meeting is not yet clear.


But what remains obvious is that, assuming the BFI receives that £45m from the Government, £5m (already pledged) from the Mayor’s Office and £15m-£20m to be accrued from the sale of their current Stephen Street offices, they will still need to find some £80m from other sources. Even assuming Lottery money is forthcoming, they will rely heavily on philanthropic donations and cash raised from commercial partnerships. We asked a spokesperson if they could envisage a ‘Sony National Film Centre’ or similar branding and were reminded that The Times London Film Festival already exists.


The more open-minded, the better – but whether £150m or £200m, public or private, what’s in it for Londoners? The BFI proposes that the new centre will sit on the South Bank but be bigger and better than its predecessor. The BFI has ruled out anywhere but the middle of the city and its eyes are on a plot of land (now a car park) that lies west of the current BFI site, nestling between the Royal Festival Hall and the London Eye.


Cynics, and guardians of the public purse, may cry that the NFT only recently had a refit to become BFI Southbank, complete with a new Mediatheque, studio cinema, gallery, bar, restaurant and a lick of paint – and all at a cost of £6m. But the BFI’s line on this is that renovation was only ever meant as a temporary move to create – again to quote Minghella – a ‘testbed’ for greater things. The BFI is now having to walk a fine line by talking up the need for a new home (that will not come to pass for at least six years) while at the same time not talking down their current operation.


The reasons given by the BFI for the need for a new centre are cultural and pragmatic. Pragmatically, the BFI Southbank is nearing the end of its shelf-life and noisy trams may be passing over Waterloo Bridge by 2011 (although this second point is a bit of a red herring as no such scheme has been agreed). The cultural reasons are two-fold: that film is too important for its home to linger half-hidden under Waterloo Bridge; and that a new, prominent space will allow for all sorts of new opportunities.


What are those new opportunities? Several conversations with BFI staff allow a broad picture to emerge even if the details remain vague. There would be roughly five cinemas, with one large auditorium capable of hosting events currently served by the Odeon Leicester Square, such as the opening night of the London Film Festival and major film premieres (this second use hints that the new centre may be more inclusive of commercial cinema and that such premieres might even become a major revenue stream). The new centre would also be a window on the BFI’s archive and restoration work – a sort of living museum to film past, present and future (an example given is that punters will be able to watch restorers at work). Crucially, the centre would also be the hub for a new, nationwide delivery of digital or digitised work, either through the transmission to cinemas around the country of live Q&A sessions or the beaming of films from the National Film & Television Archive into homes via the internet, television and their future equivalents (but only if the BFI can get over the rights minefield that such a scheme would create; it owns only 1 per cent of the material in its archive). The point is: a National Film Centre would incorporate the values (and, one hopes, the unique programming) of the current BFI Southbank but would also be more uniquely relevant and ready to advance into a digital age.


Fundraising and politics aside (for example, what would a Tory government make of the plans?), that last hope is a rightful and fascinating one. It’s crucial that some progressive thinking goes into deciding what a modern film centre should be. Is the current model of the multi-screen cinematheque adequate? Should people even be charged to watch films? Now is the time for a full debate as to what exactly this building should be. It’s time for radical thinking and it’s a discussion that we intend to continue on these pages as more details – and, hopefully, more money – emerge.

Author: Dave Calhoun


Why London needs a new national film theatre - Time Out London - Time Out London


10 October 2008

BFI Board of Governors meetings

Readers interested in the deliberations of the BFI's executive Board of Governors can read the minutes of its meetings on the BFI website:

03 September 2008

Amanda Nevill on BFI's latest initiative

BFI director Amanda Nevill speaks in the Guardian today about the BFI's poll to find the classic films that are considered worthy to be bequeathed to future generations. The poll is part of the BFI's 75th birthday celebrations and has been reported in national broadsheets.

Fans invited to name the movie they would bequeath to future generations

· BFI seeking out the films that stand test of time
· Public urged to join stars in nominating favourites

* Charlotte Higgins, chief arts writer
* The Guardian,
* Wednesday September 3 2008


Juliette Binoche has chosen Tarkovsky's The Sacrifice. Cate Blanchett, another fan of the Russian director, has nominated his Stalker. Director Terence Davies, on the other hand, picked out Kind Hearts and Coronets for its flawless comedy and impeccable pacing. And the British Film Institute is asking members of the public the question: if you had to choose one film to bequeath to future generations, what would it be?

The scheme, launched yesterday, is part of the BFI's 75th birthday celebrations. It is a young institution, compared with the National Gallery and British Museum. But, says BFI director Amanda Nevill, the organisation is just as important as those museums in protecting and promoting our cultural heritage.

"Film is society's chosen medium," she said. "We still don't value film in the way we do Roman vases or Titian. We give a certain reverence to paintings that we don't give to films. I want film to occupy the same sort of importance as Titian and Turner. It is just as important, and not just some trite entertainment thing."

The BFI has already invited 75 figures from the film industry to nominate the film that they would most like to see passed down to future generations. Veteran actor Leslie Phillips named Empire of the Sun by Steven Spielberg, in which he appeared, because, he said: "I was absolutely knocked out by Steven. He was so sweet, so lovely, and so good." Jaime Winstone, the young actor who has just appeared in Olly Blackburn's horror movie Donkey Punch, picked out Quadrophenia. "It had a real impact on me when I watched it when I was younger," she said. "It has never left me, and it inspired me to go into film."

Members of the public are being invited to nominate films on the BFI website over the next month. The five or 10 films that emerge as the most popular will be shown at the BFI Southbank in London and then at cinemas across the country.

Among the nominations so far, David Lean is an early favourite. Sir Roger Moore nominated Lawrence of Arabia; producer Stephen Woolley Great Expectations; and Ryan's Daughter was also selected.

The films of Michael Powell and Emeric Pressburger have also received an enthusiastic response, with Patrick Marber putting forward The Red Shoes and three nominations for the postwar masterpiece A Matter of Life and Death, making it, perhaps surprisingly, the single most nominated movie so far.

Other British films that were put forward include Lynne Ramsay's Ratcatcher; Shane Meadows's This is England; Lindsay Anderson's If and Ken Loach's Kes. Bill Nighy chose Alan Parker's Mississippi Burning, and Chiwetel Ejiofor nominated Stanley Kubrick's Dr Strangelove.

Those nominating have freedom to chose outside the British canon.

Nevill defended the choice to extend the possibilities to Hollywood and world cinema, saying: "It never crossed our minds to limit this to British films. It is one of the great things about British culture in general that it has always been outward looking and contextualised globally. British film is not so weedy that it needs to be selected out."

Most of the films selected so far are mid-20th century classics: Ingmar Bergman's The Seventh Seal; the musical Singin' in the Rain; Fellini's 8½; Eisenstein's Ivan the Terrible; and Carol Reed's Third Man.

But some recent films have been chosen as classics of the future. Composer Michael Nyman, who scored many of Peter Greenaway's films, picked out Mexican director Carlos Reygadas's Silent Light (2007) - a film that has no score. Other more recent nominations include Werner Herzog's Grizzly Man (2005); Noel Clarke's Adulthood (2008); and Clarke's own nomination of Pulp Fiction (1994).

http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2008/sep/03/1

21 August 2008

BFI in Cinema Journal

The latest issue of Cinema Journal, the magazine of the Society for Cinema & Media Studies, has devoted its In Focus section to a collection of articles about the history and current situation of the BFI. Contributors include Toby Miller, Charlotte Brunsdon, Geoffrey Nowell-Smith, Colin McArthur, Ed Buscombe and Pam Cook.

The articles can be accessed free via the SCMS website:

http://www.cmstudies.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=960&Itemid=188

[You may have difficulty accessing this link -- the site owner has been informed of the problem.]

If the problem persists, you should be able to get a PDF version via this link:

http://docs.google.com/fileview?id=F.2190d0be-b20c-43ec-9099-48a498b5ab2a



20 August 2008

Janet Moat retires


Janet Moat retired last week, after 30 years at the BFI. As curator of Special Collections she brought a wealth of knowledge and expertise to the management of this internationally renowned resource, providing invaluable help to researchers. BFIwatch wishes her all the best in her new life.