The Times Higher Education Supplement published a follow-up letter today, updating readers on the BFI's realignment plans.
No to BFI realignment
Following the letter by 48 film academics expressing concern about the future of the British Film Institute (Letters, June 1), readers should note that subsequent announcements confirm that the BFI is redefining its educational remit.
The BFI's envisaged outsourcing of its publishing arm constitutes merely one stage in a process of radical 'realignment'. This extends to a range of other activities and services, including the BFI Library, a core research and education facility, which could soon be closed or divested to a consortium of London-based higher education institutions. This would fundamentally alter the library's status as a public national and international resource.
The institute has so far only selectively disseminated its plans in detail -- for more information, visit www.bfiwatch.blogspot.com Particularly worrying is the lack of consultation and transparency in arriving at this strategy, and the vague terms in which the BFI defines its future role in film education. The institute's management portrays the downscaling of core activities in favour of expensive projects such as the South Bank Centre as an opportunity, but the arguments put forward to justify the proposed measures do not convince. Public discussion is needed as to what purpose and constituency a 'realigned' BFI is meant to serve.
Prof Tim Bergfelder
Head of Film Studies
Southampton University
No to BFI realignment
Following the letter by 48 film academics expressing concern about the future of the British Film Institute (Letters, June 1), readers should note that subsequent announcements confirm that the BFI is redefining its educational remit.
The BFI's envisaged outsourcing of its publishing arm constitutes merely one stage in a process of radical 'realignment'. This extends to a range of other activities and services, including the BFI Library, a core research and education facility, which could soon be closed or divested to a consortium of London-based higher education institutions. This would fundamentally alter the library's status as a public national and international resource.
The institute has so far only selectively disseminated its plans in detail -- for more information, visit www.bfiwatch.blogspot.com Particularly worrying is the lack of consultation and transparency in arriving at this strategy, and the vague terms in which the BFI defines its future role in film education. The institute's management portrays the downscaling of core activities in favour of expensive projects such as the South Bank Centre as an opportunity, but the arguments put forward to justify the proposed measures do not convince. Public discussion is needed as to what purpose and constituency a 'realigned' BFI is meant to serve.
Prof Tim Bergfelder
Head of Film Studies
Southampton University
1 comment:
Dear Pam
I am series editor of the BFI series of teaching resources for A level Film & Media Studies teachers ('Teaching Film & Media Studies' - www.bfi.org.uk/tfms) and represent around 20 BFI authors who share your concerns.
Please see my blog for a more detailed perspective of my concerns at this end of the BFI publishing market - http://vivienneclark.blogspot.com/.
The new professional association for teachers of media education (primary and secondary level) - called MEA - aims to present its own letter in support of MeCCSAs soon.
Thanks for taking the time to put all this info together.
Post a Comment